Against the Current, No. 103, March/April 2003
-
The Colossus and Destruction
— The Editors -
The New York Transit Contract Struggle
— an interview with Steve Downs -
Race and Class: Defending Affirmative Action
— Malik Miah -
"We Must Not Turn Back..."
— a statement by Civil Rights Veterans -
The World Social Forum and Global Justice
— Paul Le Blanc and Stephanie Luce -
Behind the New Korean Crisis
— Martin Hart-Landsberg -
Thoughts on Brazil's Future
— an interview with Gianpaolo Baiocchi -
Venezuela, Chavez and the Political Vacuum
— Francisco T. Sobrino -
Argentina: Workers' Control and the Crisis, Part I
— James Cockcroft -
Labor Speaking Out Against Bush's War
— Dianne Feeley -
We Can Stop This War!
— Michael Letwin -
The Battle of Second Avenue
— Roger Horowitz -
Camera Lucida: The Power of Home
— Arlene Keizer -
Camera Lucida: The Power of Home
— Arlene R. Keizer -
Random Shots: Just Say No to Dubya
— R.F. Kampfer - Women, War and Social Justice
-
Women's Experiences of War
— Dianne Feeley -
Myrna Mack, A Guatemalan Hero
— Cindy Forster -
The Rebel Girl: Come Out Against the War
— Catherine Sameh - Reviews
-
Phyllis Bennis' Calling the Shots
— Chris Clement -
Dan Connell's Rethinking Revolution
— David Finkel - In Memoriam
-
Remembering Archie Lieberman
— David Finkel -
Joe Strummer, Voice of the Clash
— Scott McLemee - Letters to Against the Current
-
On Revolution in the Air
— Barry Sheppard
Michael Letwin
BUSH’S WAR ON Iraq isn’t about “weapons of mass destruction” — the United States can’t even prove that Iraq has any. And who has more weapons of mass destruction than the United States?
It isn’t for “self-defense” — Iraq hasn’t attacked us. It isn’t to support the United Nations — the U.S. pays Israel billions of dollars each year to violate UN resolutions that guarantee Palestinian rights. And Israel already has nuclear weapons.
It isn’t for “democracy” — for years, the United States armed Hussein (and Osama bin Laden). U.S. allies include numerous dictatorships, including Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Colombia.
In reality, Bush’s war is a “weapon of mass distraction” — from oil profit, from U.S. empire, from corporate thievery and from a crumbling economy at home.
As Nelson Mandela puts it, Bush and his cronies “just want the oil.”
This war can’t be made right. Not by Bush. Not by the UN.
We need to ask ourselves some hard questions:
What have the Iraqi people ever done to us?
Fifty-eight thousand G.I.s — most of them working class and people of color — were killed in Vietnam. Are we ready to pay for this war with the blood of our sons and daughters in uniform?
With destruction of our social services?
With zero-wage increases?
With Bush’s attack on labor, civil and immigrant rights?
With more blowback like 9/11?
In 1967, Martin Luther King, Jr. refused to remain silent about the Vietnam war and “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government.”
We have the same obligation. Regime change begins at home.
We also have the power to stop this war.
When G.I.s refused to fight in Vietnam, the U.S. war machine ground to a halt.
Several weeks ago, British railway workers refused to drive trains loaded with weapons for war against Iraq.
And U.S. labor is beginning to speak out. Unions with more than five million members — one-third of organized labor — have already come out against the war. U.S. Labor Against the War was founded in January. Thirty NYC-area labor bodies have endorsed today’s massive antiwar protest.
If you believe that labor must stand up against the war, contact: nyclaw01@excite.com, or at NYCLAW, Prince Street Station, PO Box 233, New York, NY 10012-3900.